Operators who know how to work the queue, analysts who can configure and read the fusion, and commanders who have used the thing before the night they have to rely on it. This service builds and assesses that capability against a written standard.
Every program is built around your deployment, your roles and your own scenarios. Delivery is by practitioners who have operated the platform, not read about it.
Platform navigation, alert handling, field coordination and TAK workflows as they exist in your deployment, assessed rather than attended.
Fusion pipeline configuration, cross domain correlation, querying and intelligence product generation, worked against your own data and your own asset model.
For the people who have to act: reading the ranked picture, interrogating an item, and deciding with the coverage and the uncertainty in front of them.
Your team working the platform through scenarios drawn from your estate, under a clock, with the decisions and the timings recorded as they happen.
Structured play against adversary courses of action, with a red team pressing the assumptions your deployment rests on and an after action record at the end.
Instructor development inside your organization, so routine onboarding and refresher training can be run by your own people without us in the room.
Course length is agreed after the baseline, not before it. The order below holds regardless of how large the program turns out to be.
Who operates, who analyzes, who decides, and what each of them already does without the platform. Training built on an assumed baseline teaches the wrong people the wrong thing.
A course architecture per role, tied to your deployment and written against an assessable standard, agreed with you before anything is delivered.
Delivered by practitioners who have operated AETHOS in a live environment, using your configuration rather than a demonstration tenant.
Tabletop or wargame against scenarios from your own estate, run under a clock, observed and recorded.
Participants are assessed against the written standard. A certificate says what was demonstrated, and the record says what was not.
Where train the trainer is in scope, your instructors deliver under observation before they carry the program themselves.
Training is worth what remains after the people who attended it move on. Everything below is yours to keep, reuse and re run.
What this service does not promise.
It does not promise a performance figure. Certification records what a person demonstrated on the day, against a standard you can read, and an exercise record says what happened in that exercise. Neither is a claim about how your organization will perform in an incident.
It does not promise that training substitutes for coverage. Where the deployment is partial, an exercise will show that, and the after action record will say so rather than working around it.
We look at one role in your organization and one scenario you already worry about, and say what a credible standard for that role would have to include.